At Thu, 26 Dec 2002 21:46:45 -0800, Jeff Bailey wrote: > We've been waiting based on Neuro's advice that sometimes Arm bugs are > difficult to test for. The buildd is broken in that it appears to > select the wrong header. Because all I have is a remote account on an > Arm box, I can't test X - which is one of the big ones I test before I > upload an arch without consulting a porter first. > > Debussy built -6 just fine. I haven't tested since then, but the > changes were really small. > > I'll start a build on Debussy now. I can do inital chroot jail testing, > but I'd really like someone to test it running an X client.
...And should we wait for it? There still remains two major concerns: arm build issue, and h_errno fix which is recently introduced in upstream cvs. Arm issue is a bit for all debian users. h_errno fix patch is very fresh, so it shouldn't include, IMHO. And releasing -9 is more important. I really want to release 2.3.1-9, it resolves some RC bugs: #170507, #174267, #174436. From Daniel Jacobowitz, #174781 is not grave bug, so we can downgrade to another severity. Any comments are welcome. Regards, -- gotom
