Your message dated Sun, 29 Dec 2002 11:14:05 +0900
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#152962: locales: powerpc build of locales depends on
_glibc_, not libc6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Jul 2002 21:01:07 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jul 14 16:01:07 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from relay.porschenet.hu [213.163.3.2]
by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 17TqUM-00050m-00; Sun, 14 Jul 2002 16:01:07 -0500
Received: (qmail 10145 invoked from network); 14 Jul 2002 20:57:36 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO vega.digitel2002.hu) (213.163.0.181)
by relay.porschenet.hu with SMTP; 14 Jul 2002 20:57:36 -0000
Received: (qmail 21126 invoked by uid 1000); 14 Jul 2002 21:00:27 -0000
Date: 14 Jul 2002 21:00:27 -0000
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: "G�bor" "L�n�rt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: locale: dependency information in locale package. is it bug?
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailer: bug 3.3.10.1
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: locale
Version: N/A
Severity: normal
Now I've tried to install package locales, and I got:
locales: Depends: glibc-2.2.5-10.0 but it is not installable
I think it's wrong, since libc6-2.2.5-10.0 _IS_ installed but not glibc.
Maybe package maintainers should choose that they call libc6 (aka glibc2)
as package libc6 _OR_ glibc finally. Or have I missed something? If so,
please forgive me.
thanx!
-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Kernel Version: Linux vega 2.4.18 #2 Tue May 14 09:58:09 CEST 2002 i686 unknown
unknown GNU/Linux
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 152962-done) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Dec 2002 02:14:07 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Dec 28 20:14:07 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from oris.opensource.jp (oris.opensource.gr.jp) [218.44.239.73]
(postfix)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18SSxq-0007yB-00; Sat, 28 Dec 2002 20:14:07 -0600
Received: from oris.opensource.jp (oris.opensource.jp [218.44.239.73])
by oris.opensource.gr.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP
id AC4E6C3495; Sun, 29 Dec 2002 11:14:05 +0900 (JST)
Date: Sun, 29 Dec 2002 11:14:05 +0900
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#152962: locales: powerpc build of locales depends on _glibc_,
not libc6
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.9.9 (Unchained Melody) SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya)
FLIM/1.14.3 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Unebigory=F2mae?=) APEL/10.3 Emacs/21.2
(i386-debian-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.3 - "Ushinoya")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-10.6 required=5.0
tests=IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES,SPAM_PHRASE_02_03,
USER_AGENT
version=2.41
X-Spam-Level:
At Sat, 28 Dec 2002 22:39:31 +0100 (CET),
Michel Lanners wrote:
> On 28 Dec, this message from GOTO Masanori echoed through cyberspace:
> > At Fri, 27 Dec 2002 23:32:26 +0100,
> > Michel Lanners wrote:
> >> Versions of packages locales depends on:
> >> ii debconf 1.0.32 Debian configuration
> >> management sy
> >> ii libc6 [glibc-2.3.1-5] 2.3.1-5 GNU C Library: Shared
> >> libraries an
> >>
> >>
> >> See the dependency above? That changed with version 2.3.1-8, and now it
> >> depends _only_ on glibc. Here's what I get on upgrading:
> >>
> >> Sorry, but the following packages have unmet dependencies:
> >> locales: Depends: glibc-2.3.1-8 but it is not installable
> >
> > OK, so could I close this bug?
>
> Ehmm... if it is resolved, yes. But it is _not_ resolved in version
> 2.3.1-8 for powerpc (i386 is OK). I never had that dpeendency problem so
> far, but it appeared now with 2.3.1-8.
It seems locales and libc6 package propagation problem...
locales is "all" package, but libc6 is "architecture (powerpc)"
package, and building powerpc packages need compilation time; so it
may be inconsistent. Now there should be powerpc 2.3.1-8 libc6
package, so this problem does not occur.
At least this bug can be closed, but we should think this propagation
problem for not only libc6 but also all packages.
> But I just double-checked, and it now works.
>
> So yes, I think you can close this bug.
Thanks! I close this bug.
Regards,
-- gotom
