Your message dated Mon, 21 Oct 2002 16:13:13 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Cannot Reproduce Bug
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Mar 1999 06:56:38 +0000
Received: (qmail 17628 invoked from network); 30 Mar 1999 06:56:36 -0000
Received: from alpha.mz.rhein-main.de (@193.141.105.17)
  by master.debian.org with SMTP; 30 Mar 1999 06:56:36 -0000
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
        by alpha.mz.rhein-main.de (8.9.2+3.1W/8.9.3/Debian/GNU) id JAA04083;
        Tue, 30 Mar 1999 09:04:01 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 1999 09:04:01 +0200 (CEST)
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: Michael Neuffer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: netbase: (On Intel) rpcinfo -p alpha : No remote programs registered.
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailer: bug 3.1.7

Package: netbase
Version: 3.14-1

The Intel system does not see the registered programms on the 
Alpha side. Locally on the Alpha,  lpha->Intel and Intel local works fine

schlepflop(intel):~#rpcinfo -p schlepflop
   program vers proto   port
    100000    2   tcp    111  portmapper
    100000    2   udp    111  portmapper
    100003    2   udp   2049  nfs
    100003    2   tcp   2049  nfs
    100005    1   udp    740  mountd
    100005    2   udp    740  mountd
    100005    1   tcp    743  mountd
    100005    2   tcp    743  mountd
    100007    2   udp    845  ypbind
    100007    1   udp    845  ypbind
    100007    2   tcp    848  ypbind
    100007    1   tcp    848  ypbind

schlepflop:~# rpcinfo -p alpha
No remote programs registered.

chlepflop:~# pcat passwd
YPBINDPROC_DOMAIN: Domain not bound
No such map passwd.byname. Reason: Can't bind to server which serves this domain

alpha:~# rpcinfo -p
   program vers proto   port
    100000    2   tcp    111  portmapper
    100000    2   udp    111  portmapper
    100004    2   udp    817  ypserv
    100004    1   udp    817  ypserv
    100004    2   tcp    820  ypserv
    100004    1   tcp    820  ypserv
    100009    1   udp    818  yppasswdd
 600100069    1   udp    821
 600100069    1   tcp    823
    100007    2   udp    825  ypbind
    100007    1   udp    825  ypbind
    100007    2   tcp    828  ypbind
    100007    1   tcp    828  ypbind
    100003    2   udp   2049  nfs
    100003    2   tcp   2049  nfs
    100005    1   udp    962  mountd
    100005    2   udp    962  mountd
    100005    1   tcp    965  mountd
    100005    2   tcp    965  mountd


alpha:~# rpcinfo -p schlepflop
   program vers proto   port
    100000    2   tcp    111  portmapper
    100000    2   udp    111  portmapper
    100003    2   udp   2049  nfs
    100003    2   tcp   2049  nfs
    100005    1   udp    740  mountd
    100005    2   udp    740  mountd
    100005    1   tcp    743  mountd
    100005    2   tcp    743  mountd
    100007    2   udp    845  ypbind
    100007    1   udp    845  ypbind
    100007    2   tcp    848  ypbind
    100007    1   tcp    848  ypbind


-- System Information
Debian Release: potato
Kernel Version: Linux alpha 2.2.5-ac1 #5 Tue Mar 30 01:42:35 CEST 1999 alpha 
unknown

Versions of the packages netbase depends on:
ii  libc6.1         2.1.1-0.1      GNU C Library: shared libraries
ii  libc6.1         2.1.1-0.1      GNU C Library: shared libraries

--- Begin /etc/init.d/netbase (modified conffile)
#!/bin/sh
#
spoofprotect () {
    # This is the best method: turn on Source Address Verification and get
    # spoof protection on all current and future interfaces.
    if [ -e /proc/sys/net/ipv4/conf/all/rp_filter ]; then
        echo -n "Setting up IP spoofing protection..."
        for f in /proc/sys/net/ipv4/conf/*/rp_filter; do
            echo 1 > $f
        done
        echo "done."
    # rules for linux 2.0.x and 2.1.x (x < 102) kernels
    elif [ -e /proc/net/ip_input ]; then
        echo -n "NOT Setting up IP spoofing protection here...(happens later)"
        # delete and readd entry (this way we don't get duplicate entries)
        # deny incoming packets pretending to be from 127.0.0.1
        # deny incoming packets pretending to be from our own system.
        # set your own IP address below (or use `hostname -i` to set it).
        echo "done."
    # rules for linux 2.1.x (x > 101) kernels
    elif [ -e /proc/net/ip_fwchains ]; then
        echo -n "NOT Setting up IP spoofing protection here...(happens later)"
        # deny incoming packets pretending to be from our own system.
        # set your own IP address below (or use `hostname -i` to set it).
        echo "done."
    fi
}
checkportmap () {
    if ! /usr/bin/rpcinfo -u localhost portmapper >/dev/null 2>/dev/null; then
        if grep -v "^ *#" /etc/inetd.conf | grep 'rpc/' >/dev/null; then
            echo
            echo "WARNING: portmapper inactive - RPC services unavailable!"
            echo "         (Commenting out the rpc services in inetd.conf will"
            echo "         disable this message)"
            echo
        fi
    fi
} 
case "$1" in
    start)
        spoofprotect
        checkportmap
        echo -n "Starting base networking daemons:"
        echo -n " inetd" ; start-stop-daemon --start --quiet --exec 
/usr/sbin/inetd
        echo "."
        ;;
    stop)
        echo -n "Stopping base networking daemons:"
        echo -n " inetd" ; start-stop-daemon --stop --quiet --oknodo --pidfile 
/var/run/inetd.pid --exec /usr/sbin/inetd
        echo "."
        ;;
    reload)
        start-stop-daemon --stop --quiet --oknodo --pidfile /var/run/inetd.pid 
--signal 1 --exec /usr/sbin/inetd
        ;;
    force-reload)
        $0 reload
        ;;
    restart)
        start-stop-daemon --stop --quiet --oknodo --pidfile /var/run/inetd.pid 
--exec /usr/sbin/inetd
        checkportmap
        start-stop-daemon --start --quiet --exec /usr/sbin/inetd
        ;;
    *)
        echo "Usage: /etc/init.d/netbase {start|stop|reload|restart}"
        exit 1
        ;;
esac
exit 0

--- End /etc/init.d/netbase

--- Begin /etc/hosts.allow (modified conffile)
sendmail: all
#
#
#
portmap: 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0

--- End /etc/hosts.allow

--- Begin /etc/hosts.deny (modified conffile)
#
#
#
ALL: PARANOID
portmap: ALL

--- End /etc/hosts.deny
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 35253-done) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Oct 2002 23:13:14 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Oct 21 18:13:14 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from olympus.nisa.net [207.194.212.100] 
        by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
        id 183ljV-0006ls-00; Mon, 21 Oct 2002 18:13:13 -0500
Received: from olympus.nisa.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])
        by olympus.nisa.net (8.12.2/8.12.2/Debian -5) with ESMTP id 
g9LNDDSZ009312
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 21 Oct 2002 16:13:13 -0700
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
        by olympus.nisa.net (8.12.2/8.12.2/Debian -5) id g9LNDDD5009310
        for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 21 Oct 2002 16:13:13 -0700
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 16:13:13 -0700
From: Jeff Bailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Cannot Reproduce Bug
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.2 required=5.0
        tests=SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,USER_AGENT,
              USER_AGENT_MUTT
        version=2.41
X-Spam-Level: 

A request for followup was posted in May of 1999 and no response was
received so I'm closing this bug.  Please feel free to reopen with
more details.

Tks,
Jeff Bailey

-- 
learning from failures is nice in theory...
but in practice, it sucks :)
 - Wolfgang Jaehrling


Reply via email to