> Since you're saying that glibc doesn't want to work around a kernel bug, > I'm sure you can appreciate that we aren't keen on working around what > we see as an inadequacy in glibc either. The mutual unwillingness to > perpetrate workarounds is why this argument has dragged on for so many > months. The proposed solutions in openssh so far seem to have involved > hacks like testing utsname.release to see whether the kernel is 2.2, > which is clearly quite nasty (at least test features, not version > numbers ...).
Fine. Send a patch to README.Debian that says this. -- Debian - http://www.debian.org/ Linux 1394 - http://www.linux1394.org/ Subversion - http://subversion.tigris.org/ Deqo - http://www.deqo.com/
