"Petr Vandrovec" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On 24 Feb 00 at 0:24, Eloy A. Paris wrote: > > Hi Petr! > > This is really puzzling!!! > > The ncpfs package in Debian has an important bug filed against it and this > > bug could cause Potato to be released without ncpfs!!! > > > I think that it is ldd bug. Even if it is not ldd bug, ldd must > > > not segfault under any conditions. > > I agree. > Hi everyone, > I'm upstream ncpfs maintainer, if you do not know... > I simple cannot understand, how if ldd segfaults even someone can think > about problem being in ncpfs - ncpfs works for all other architectures, it
I already said (as the bug reporter), to the Debian folks, that it was a mistake to report it to ncpfs and rather it has been reassigned to our package that contains ldd. It's being looked at, let's not be so hostile please :-) -- John
