Your message dated Fri, 14 Jan 2005 10:53:43 +0900
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#265245: glibc-doc: htonl/ntohl belong in arpa/inet.h
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Aug 2004 11:08:46 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Aug 12 04:08:46 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from arnor.apana.org.au [203.14.152.115] (mail)
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1BvDRt-0007ih-00; Thu, 12 Aug 2004 04:08:46 -0700
Received: from gondolin.me.apana.org.au ([192.168.0.6] ident=mail)
        by arnor.apana.org.au with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
        id 1BvDRr-0000Ay-00
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 12 Aug 2004 21:08:43 +1000
Received: from herbert by gondolin.me.apana.org.au with local (Exim 3.36 #1 
(Debian))
        id 1BvDRq-0000oc-00
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 12 Aug 2004 21:08:42 +1000
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: glibc-doc: htonl/ntohl belong in arpa/inet.h
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailer: bug 3.3.10.2
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2004 21:08:42 +1000
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.4 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
        NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: glibc-doc
Version: 2.3.2.ds1-13
Severity: normal

According to POSIX, htonl/ntohl are declared in arpa/inet.h.  So
the info text should be modified to refer to that file instead of
netinet/in.h.

-- System Information
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Kernel Version: Linux gondolin 2.4.26-1-686-smp #1 SMP Sat May 1 19:17:11 EST 
2004 i686 GNU/Linux


---------------------------------------
Received: (at 265245-done) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Jan 2005 01:53:44 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jan 13 17:53:44 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from omega.webmasters.gr.jp (webmasters.gr.jp) [218.44.239.78] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1CpGel-0002XU-00; Thu, 13 Jan 2005 17:53:44 -0800
Received: from omega.webmasters.gr.jp (localhost [127.0.0.1])
        by webmasters.gr.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP
        id 4B0FBDEB4B; Fri, 14 Jan 2005 10:53:43 +0900 (JST)
Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 10:53:43 +0900
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#265245: glibc-doc: htonl/ntohl belong in arpa/inet.h
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.9.9 (Unchained Melody) SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya)
 FLIM/1.14.3 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Unebigory=F2mae?=) APEL/10.3 Emacs/21.2
 (i386-debian-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.3 - "Ushinoya")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

At Thu, 12 Aug 2004 21:08:42 +1000,
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> According to POSIX, htonl/ntohl are declared in arpa/inet.h.  So
> the info text should be modified to refer to that file instead of
> netinet/in.h.

Exactly POSIX says it should be arpa/inet.h.  However glibc put such
definitions in netinet/in.h.  But don't worry because arpa/inet.h
always includes netinet/in.h, so we don't violate POSIX definition.  I
close this report.

Regards,
-- gotom



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to