At Thu, 2 Dec 2004 12:37:23 +0100 (CET), Santiago Vila wrote: > On Wed, 1 Dec 2004, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > > > Conclusion: > > > > - I would like to see those links in sarge (for amd64 only, no change > > for other archs) since they are currently essential for amd64 (glibc > > relies on it). What package provides them is no that important. In > > base-files it is realy simple to do so. > > > > - If the links are split out of base-files into other debs and those > > don't make it to sarge I would still rather patch base-files for > > sarge amd64 before I touch anything else. It is the simplest place > > to put them. > > My conclusion: As the symlinks will not be there forever, it's glibc > who relies on them, and there might be potential problems at the time > of removing them if they are not in the same package as the dynamic > linker or libc6, I consider the glibc package should be the one to > manage the symlinks.
Looking at the patch, there're two symlinks: /lib64 and /usr/X11R6/lib64. We don't touch /usr/X11R6 in libc6. Andreas, is it nice to symlink from /lib to /lib64 ? I agree we have /lib64 on amd64. Regards, -- gotom -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
