Your message dated Sun, 10 Oct 2004 12:40:07 +0900
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#169424: libc6 doesn't show errors when services can't be restarted
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Nov 2002 04:57:29 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Nov 16 22:57:29 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from 12-239-172-122.client.attbi.com (yakko.doogie.org) [12.239.172.122] 
(uucp)
        by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
        id 18DHUv-0000e8-00; Sat, 16 Nov 2002 22:57:29 -0600
Received: from localhost [127.0.0.1] (uucp)
        by yakko.doogie.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
        id 18DHUv-0005iJ-00; Sat, 16 Nov 2002 22:57:29 -0600
Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2002 22:57:29 -0600 (CST)
From: Adam Heath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-X-Sender: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: libc6 doesn't show errors when services can't be restarted
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.2 required=5.0
        tests=SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,USER_AGENT_PINE
        version=2.41
X-Spam-Level: 

package: libc6
version: 2.3.1-3
severity: wishlist

Restarting services possibly affected by the upgrade:
...
  apache: stopping...starting...FAILED! (1)
...
The following services failed to start: apache

It'd be nice if the output of the init script was saved to a file(stdout and
stderr separately), and when an error is detected, both files were sent to the
correct place.

In fact, it might be suggested that libc6 should *not* redirect the output at
all.



---------------------------------------
Received: (at 169424-done) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Oct 2004 03:40:08 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Oct 09 20:40:08 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from omega.webmasters.gr.jp (webmasters.gr.jp) [218.44.239.78] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1CGUZ6-0005og-00; Sat, 09 Oct 2004 20:40:08 -0700
Received: from omega.webmasters.gr.jp (localhost [127.0.0.1])
        by webmasters.gr.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC06EDEB5D
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 10 Oct 2004 12:40:07 +0900 (JST)
Date: Sun, 10 Oct 2004 12:40:07 +0900
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#169424: libc6 doesn't show errors when services can't be restarted
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
        <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.9.9 (Unchained Melody) SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya)
 FLIM/1.14.3 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Unebigory=F2mae?=) APEL/10.3 Emacs/21.2
 (i386-debian-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.3 - "Ushinoya")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

At Thu, 29 Jul 2004 10:40:31 +0900,
GOTO Masanori wrote:
> Frankly speaking, I think it's not good idea.  As package maintainer,
> I would like not to apply your wish.  I couldn't find the merit.  I
> would like to see the message to stdout.  If you don't have strong
> objection, I'll close this bug.

I close this bug.

Regards,
-- gotom


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to