also sprach GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.09.25.0420 +0200]: > > Tue Sep 14 06:19:23 Croatia/Split 2004 > > > > it should be > > > > Tue Sep 14 06:19:23 GMT 2004 > > Show us your reason of "it should be" with the standard documents, > without your opinion.
Oh, whatever. I am not going to search whether this is specified in the standards. I am talking about common sense here. A line such as Tue Sep 14 06:19:23 Croatia/Split 2004 is just plain wrong. Either date should report an error when the requested timezone cannot be found, or it should specify which timezone is at the basis of the date and time it reports. What it's doing right now is plain wrong, IMHO. Yes, that's my opinion. -- Please do not CC me when replying to lists; I read them! .''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : :' : proud Debian developer, admin, and user `. `'` `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system Invalid/expired PGP subkeys? Use subkeys.pgp.net as keyserver!
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
