Your message dated Tue, 14 Sep 2004 10:56:48 +0900
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#271289: glibc-doc should recommend manpages-dev
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at maintonly) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Sep 2004 13:02:36 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 12 06:02:36 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from ciara.youam.de [213.133.98.24]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1C6U03-0003vp-00; Sun, 12 Sep 2004 06:02:36 -0700
Received: from ciara.youam.de (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by ciara.youam.de (8.12.9/8.12.9/Debian-3) with ESMTP id i8CD2P4i024843
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=OK);
Sun, 12 Sep 2004 15:02:25 +0200
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by ciara.youam.de (8.12.9/8.12.9/Debian-3) id i8CD2P8V024841;
Sun, 12 Sep 2004 15:02:25 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: Uli Martens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: glibc-doc should recommend manpages-dev
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.50
Date: Sun, 12 Sep 2004 15:02:25 +0200
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
Package: glibc-doc
Version: N/A; reported 2004-09-12
Severity: minor
Hi there!
Please make glibc-doc Suggests: or Recommends: manpages-dev, as
manpages-dev contains many of the library-call documentation manpages
one would naïvely expect in glibc-doc.
thank you,
Uli
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 271289-done) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Sep 2004 01:56:53 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Sep 13 18:56:53 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from omega.webmasters.gr.jp (webmasters.gr.jp) [218.44.239.78]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1C72Yu-0007EN-00; Mon, 13 Sep 2004 18:56:53 -0700
Received: from omega.webmasters.gr.jp (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by webmasters.gr.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 5332FDEB80; Tue, 14 Sep 2004 10:56:48 +0900 (JST)
Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2004 10:56:48 +0900
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Uli Martens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Bug#271289: glibc-doc should recommend manpages-dev
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.9.9 (Unchained Melody) SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya)
FLIM/1.14.3 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Unebigory=F2mae?=) APEL/10.3 Emacs/21.2
(i386-debian-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.3 - "Ushinoya")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
At Mon, 13 Sep 2004 12:04:21 +0200,
Uli Martens wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 13, 2004 at 02:54:41PM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote:
> > libc6-dev already suggests manpages-dev. Do you want to add
> > manpages-dev in glibc-doc? I have no opinion about it, but glibc-doc
> > is not manpages, so I'm not prefer to take your idea.
>
> Oh, I missed that, sorry. I think that's because libc6-dev got installed
> via build-essential, but I didn't care for the Suggests: then, and
> missed it again later, on installing glibc-doc. I'd keep this in the BTS
> just in case anyone else stumples over the same thing, but if you want
> to close it, I'm fine with that, too.
"installing build-essential" is debian developer's knowledge.
Considering from the derivation of your idea is "build essential", I
think adding Suggests: manpages-dev may be excess for most users. So
I decided close this bug. However, if you think there're another
reasons, let me know and reopen this report. I'll rethink this
report.
I think one idea to fix this problem is to create build-essential-doc
which installs manpages and doc pages of gcc, libc, make, and so on.
But it may also be over-preparation.
Regards,
-- gotom
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
