Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Thomas Bushnell BSG writes: > > > > On behalf of Debian QA: > > > > Matthias, you reopened bug 266598 which according to Blars Blarson was > > fixed, and there is no indication in the reopen message why. Was this > > a mistake? > > No. I did build glibc using binutils 2.14.x and did upload it to > unstable. So it's unknown if it builds using binutils-2.15. You could > tag it as sid, so that the report doesn't prohibit a transition to > testing (as long as binutils-2.15 is in unstable and not in testing).
Thanks for the information; I assume the debian-glibc team will do the right thing. I just wanted to make sure it wasn't lying idle. :) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
