On Mon, 2004-07-12 at 19:17, GOTO Masanori wrote: > BTW, regardless of this bug, I think providing libc-dbg is useful for > especially package selection. libc-pic, libc-udeb, libc-dev and libc > are already provided. It's natural to provide libc-dbg. > > Jeff, any objections? I would add libc-dbg to the cvs.
Well, libc-udeb is supposed to be renamed to libc6-udeb as soon as Sarge releases. =) I think the provides is fine though. Tks, Jeff Bailey -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
