On Sun, Dec 07, 2003 at 12:11:03PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote: > On Tue, Dec 02, 2003 at 09:19:15AM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 02, 2003 at 05:33:36AM -0600, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > > > Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > > > > > > > severity 219940 serious > > > Bug#219940: __invalid_size_argument_for_IOC should be unsigned int > > > Severity set to `serious'. > > > > > > > thanks > > > Stopping processing here. > > > > It, like every other linux-kernel-headers bug, is awaiting the > > reopening of the archive. > > Mmm, the archive got re-opened yesterday, and i was expecting a new > linux-kernel-headers package in todays upgrade, but didn't see one. > Maybe my bad english made me misinterpret what you said to me here.
There is not much point until the autobuilders are running again. It will be some time. > > That said, i have investigated on the lkml, and the proposed patch > is the correct way of solving this (altough the kernel guys don't really > care about userland use of the headers, and will most assuredly not fix > this before 2.6 is released. > > Friendly, > > Sven Luther > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- Daniel Jacobowitz MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
