Your message dated Sun, 29 Dec 2002 02:09:29 +0900
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#146317: Bug has been fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 8 May 2002 23:00:54 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed May 08 18:00:54 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from stud3.tuwien.ac.at [193.170.75.13] 
        by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
        id 175aQX-0006UW-00; Wed, 08 May 2002 18:00:53 -0500
Received: from there ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [212.186.138.99])
        by stud3.tuwien.ac.at (8.9.3 (PHNE_24419)/8.9.3) with SMTP id BAA04960
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 9 May 2002 01:00:51 +0200 (METDST)
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-15"
From: Andreas Brandstetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Documentation error
Date: Thu, 9 May 2002 01:00:51 +0200
X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.3.2]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Package: glibc-doc
Version: 2.2.5-4

The info pages explicitly state that tfind is declared thus:
void * tfind (const void *KEY, void *const *ROOTP,
          comparison_fn_t COMPAR)

However, both man page "tsearch" and header file say it is "**ROOTP".

I originally found this bug on a non-debian box, so I guess it should be 
forwarded upstream, too.

best regards,
Andreas Brandstetter

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 146317-done) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Dec 2002 17:09:31 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Dec 28 11:09:31 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from oris.opensource.jp (oris.opensource.gr.jp) [218.44.239.73] (postfix)
        by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
        id 18SKSo-00040h-00; Sat, 28 Dec 2002 11:09:31 -0600
Received: from oris.opensource.jp (oris.opensource.jp [218.44.239.73])
        by oris.opensource.gr.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP
        id 8ADC3C33C1; Sun, 29 Dec 2002 02:09:29 +0900 (JST)
Date: Sun, 29 Dec 2002 02:09:29 +0900
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "H. S. Teoh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
        [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#146317: Bug has been fixed
In-Reply-To: <20021227161453.GA27752@crystal>
References: <20021227161453.GA27752@crystal>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.9.9 (Unchained Melody) SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya)
 FLIM/1.14.3 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Unebigory=F2mae?=) APEL/10.3 Emacs/21.2
 (i386-debian-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.3 - "Ushinoya")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-10.6 required=5.0
        tests=IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES,SPAM_PHRASE_02_03,
              USER_AGENT
        version=2.41
X-Spam-Level: 

At Fri, 27 Dec 2002 11:14:53 -0500,
H. S. Teoh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi, this bug has been fixed:
> 
> 1) The info pages state:
> 
>  - Function: void * tfind (const void *KEY, void *const *ROOTP,
>           comparison_fn_t COMPAR)
> 
> 2) The man page states:
> 
>        void *tfind(const void *key, const void **rootp,
>                        int(*compar)(const void *, const void *));
> 
> 3) The header file states:
> 
> /* Search for an entry matching the given KEY in the tree pointed to
>    by *ROOTP.  If no matching entry is available return NULL.  */
> extern void *tfind (__const void *__key, void *__const *__rootp,
>                     __compar_fn_t __compar);
> 
> 
> The only thing still wrong is that the comments still refer to *ROOTP, but
> I don't think that is an important issue.
> 
> So I propose that this bug be closed. Thanks!
> 
> FYI, the relevant packages on my system are:
> ii  libc6          2.3.1-3        GNU C Library: Shared libraries and Timezone
> ii  libc6-dev      2.3.1-3        GNU C Library: Development Libraries and Hea
> ii  glibc-doc      2.3.1-6        GNU C Library: Documentation
> ii  manpages-dev   1.48-2         Manual pages about using GNU/Linux for devel

Thanks for your investigation.
I close this bug.

Regards,
-- gotom


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to