On Fri, Oct 18, 2002 at 11:13:13AM +0800, Anthony Fok wrote: > So, I wonder, should libc6's postinst restart inetd or xinetd?
I'm worried that we might wind up collecting a list of packages to restart, and taking on more burden that we should. Perhaps a medium priority debconf warning that notes that after the libc upgrade, various services might now need restarting? Tks, Jeff Bailey -- learning from failures is nice in theory... but in practice, it sucks :) - Wolfgang Jaehrling -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
