On Sat, Oct 12, 2002 at 02:58:44PM -0400, Jack Howarth wrote: > I'm not sure. I know I was told that hppa was okay. Also from my > conversations with Jakub it appears i386, ia-64, alpha and sparc32 > should be fine. So I would suggest we focus on checking the status > of arm, hurd-i386, m68k, mips, mipsel, s390 and sh. I'm not sure > how many of those arches have even had glibc 2.3.1 built on them. If I run the script over my mips chroot, here's what it finds: __divdi3 __ucmpdi2 __udivdi3 __umoddi3 Now if I understand things correctly these symbols are now provided by libgcc_s.so as of gcc-3.2. So where exactly is the problem when building glibc 2.3 with gcc 3.2? -- Guido
-- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
