On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 05:04:54AM -0700, Jeff Bailey wrote: > On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 09:54:43AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote: > > Does that mean that there isn't going to be an attempt to get > > current glibc 2.2.<smallnum> into testing, by fixing #155904? Are > > you just going straight for the pre-2.3 track? > > Hmm. 155904 isn't a valid bug anymore - Apache's been recompiled to > cope with this. I'll close it now.
I'd been told that the plan was to have libc6 depend on libdb1-compat for the next release, which was why I asked. > Aside from that, in general, no - there's no plan to do further 2.2 > uploads. All of our attention is focused on ironing out the bugs to > get 2.3 into unstable. OK, thanks. -- Colin Watson [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
