drow is right, as usual :-)
randolph
----- Forwarded message from Randolph Chung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -----
From: Randolph Chung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Wichmann, Mats D" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Randolph Chung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [Linux-ia64] latest glibc snapshot does not build on ia64?
Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2002 10:46:43 -0700
In reference to a message from Wichmann, Mats D, dated Sep 03:
>
> > Haven't dug into this too much yet; wanted to see if anyone else has
> > seen this?
>
> Yup.
>
> There's a short glibc patch which takes care of this (should be on the
> Debian lists, else I can mail it to you once I get my machine back up).
> It's an "unofficial" patch because it's felt the problem really lies
> with binutils and not glibc, so it's not in glibc cvs. The change
> is to dl-machine.h if it helps search...
there was a IA64_RELOC_NONE patch, but in a different area of glibc...
looks like we just hit it again at a different spot now...
580 /* ??? Ignore MSB and Instruction format for now. */
581 if (R_IA64_FORMAT (r_type) == R_IA64_FORMAT_64LSB)
582 *reloc_addr = value;
583 else if (R_IA64_FORMAT (r_type) == R_IA64_FORMAT_32LSB)
584 *(int *) reloc_addr = value;
585 else if (r_type == R_IA64_IPLTLSB)
586 {
587 reloc_addr[0] = 0;
588 reloc_addr[1] = 0;
589 }
590 else
591 assert (! "unexpected dynamic reloc format");
r_type is 0 at the assertion
randolph
_______________________________________________
Linux-IA64 mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.linuxia64.org/lists/listinfo/linux-ia64
----- End forwarded message -----
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
