On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 10:36:00AM -0600, Howard Butler wrote:

That's unfortunate. I appreciate the efforts you have spent on it. I hope 
someone with Debian experience can pick it up. My other projects besides PDAL 
include liblas, libspatialindex, and python-rtree.

I'm going to remove PDAL support from GRASS and remove PDAL from Debian. If you 
don't want this to happen, take over pdal maintenance now.

As for the lazperf issue, we have resolved this by vendoring lazperf in PDAL 
going forward. This was achieved by working with Rapidlasso to relicense both 
LASzip and lazperf as Apache Public License 2.0. PDAL 2.4, which is to be 
released in the next month or so, will have this in place. There will no longer 
be a need for PDAL to link to LASzip or lazperf going forward from 2.4

Howard


This could be a decent alternative IMHO. In the meantime, Bas could you put on
hold the PDAL removing and eventually switch off the grass support until the
whole mess will be solved?
--
Francesco P. Lovergine

Reply via email to