Hello Bas, I have moved the files in ITCopyright section under GETCopyright. Also I updated the comment about ITK headers in ThirdParty/ITK/include.
On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 4:13 PM, sebastic <[email protected]> wrote: > On 2015-09-10 15:14, Rashad M wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 11:31 PM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: >> >>> On 04-09-15 19:29, Rashad M wrote: >>> > On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 6:36 PM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: >>> >> On 04-09-15 16:11, Rashad M wrote: >>> >>> FYI, svn trunk now shows MIT license - >>> >>> http://svn.osgeo.org/ossim/trunk/ossim/LICENSE.txt >>> >> >>> >> Are the more details about the OTB license change elsewhere? >>> >> >>> > >>> > sorry. I wasn't clear before. the change of above license was for OSSIM >>> not >>> > OTB. I noted because currently >>> Modules/ThirdParty/OssimPlugins/src/ossim >>> is >>> > using upstream license with an indication that full license text will >>> be >>> > found in LICENSE.txt file. Since next release of ossim this will ve >>> changed >>> > and maybe the files in Modules/ThirdParty/OssimPlugins/src/ossim >>> >>> Yes, I misread the ossim/otb bit. >>> >>> > But there has been on going work on moving OTB license to Apache 2.0! . >>> >>> That's cool too :-) >>> >>> >>> I can include this detail in the comment section. would that be >>> >> sufficient? >>> >> >>> >> A comment for the ITK derived files is an option, but not strictly >>> >> required. >>> >> >>> >> The Comment or Source field in the copyright header does still need to >>> >> document why 6S and SuperBuild are excluded. >>> >> >>> > >>> > I will add that. Exclusion of 6S sources are discussed in list beofre. >>> So >>> > I am not copy pasting here. For SuperBuild, there are patches directory >>> in >>> > SuperBuild/patches which contains some specific patch for dependencies. >>> > currently it is a mix and excluding superbuild completely seems an easy >>> > pick. >>> > >>> > As you said, I will include this information in copyright. >>> > >>> > Thanks again for reviewing OTB. >>> >>> I've pushed some more license & copyright changes, the copyright files >>> is nearly done. I've added two TODOs that still need some work. The >>> first is for the explanation for the repacking, the other is for the >>> missing ITCopyright.txt that is used for quite a number of files. I >>> didn't find the ITCopyright.txt in the otb git repository history, it >>> may never have been included. Since the files are licensed under the >>> CeCILL-2.0 if the ITCopyright.txt cannot be found the separate Files >>> section can be merged in the general Files: * section. >>> >>> >> I had checked about ITCopyright with the team and this file is in OTB >> under the name GETCopyright.txt in OTB/Copyright directory. >> >> Is it possible to mention this in debain/copyright? For future releases I >> will push the fix onto upstream. >> > > The GETCopyright is already documented in the copyright, see: > > http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-grass/otb.git/tree/debian/copyright#n81 > > The separate Files section for the ITCopyright files can be merged into > that section. > > Kind Regards, > > Bas > > -- Regards, Rashad
