On Sun, Sep 6, 2015 at 1:13 AM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Rashad, > > Here's my review of the lintian issues as promised. > > Splitting the libraries into separate binary packages with symbols will > get rid of 39 lintian issues. > > Making sure the binary package names match the SONAME will get rid of > the lintian warning for another three packages: > > W: otb-bin-qt: package-name-doesnt-match-sonames libOTBQtWidget-5.0-1 > W: otb-bin: package-name-doesnt-match-sonames libOTBCommandLine-5.0-1 > libOTBCommandLineParser-5.0-1 > W: libotb: package-name-doesnt-match-sonames > libOTBApplicationEngine-5.0-1 libOTBCarto-5.0-1 libOTBCommon-5.0-1 > libOTBCurlAdapters-5.0-1 libOTBEdge-5.0-1 libOTBExtendedFilename-5.0-1 > libOTBFuzzy-5.0-1 libOTBGdalAdapters-5.0-1 libOTBIOBSQ-5.0-1 > libOTBIOGDAL-5.0-1 libOTBIOKML-5.0-1 libOTBIOLUM-5.0-1 > libOTBIOMSTAR-5.0-1 libOTBIOMW-5.0-1 libOTBIOONERA-5.0-1 > libOTBIORAD-5.0-1 libOTBIOTileMap-5.0-1 libOTBImageBase-5.0-1 > libOTBImageIO-5.0-1 libOTBImageManipulation-5.0-1 libOTBMathParser-5.0-1 > libOTBMetadata-5.0-1 libOTBOSSIMAdapters-5.0-1 > libOTBOpenThreadsAdapters-5.0-1 libOTBPolarimetry-5.0-1 > libOTBProjection-5.0-1 libOTBRCC8-5.0-1 libOTBStreaming-5.0-1 > libOTBSupervised-5.0-1 libOTBTestKernel-5.0-1 libOTBTransform-5.0-1 > libOTBVectorDataBase-5.0-1 libOTBVectorDataIO-5.0-1 libOTBWavelet-5.0-1 > libotbossimplugins-5.0-1 libotbsiftfast-5.0-1
I don't see how this is useful for the OTB users, and it adds a lot of complexity to the maintenance of the package. Why would you split this? If one day external applications start using OTB it may be worth it, but now I don't see the added value. Kind Regards, Johan
