On 08/14/2015 03:12 PM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: > On 14-08-15 14:54, Alastair McKinstry wrote: >> Hi, >> >> So I've kicked off the gfortran transition. Based on the bug list >> in #790757, I've rebuild packages and done NMUs to DELAYED/3-day >> >> The current status: >> >> * libgetdata: NMU uploaded to DELAYED/3-day * grib-api : uploaded. >> * hdf5: NMU uploaded to DELAYED/3-day * mpich: uploaded * netcdf: >> See the netcdf transition. * openmpi : uploaded * petsc: NMU >> uploaded to DELAYED/3-day * qd: NMU uploaded to DELAYED/3-day * >> slepc: Depends on petsc. #788123. * libxc: NMU uploaded to >> DELAYED/3-day * oasis3 : Depends on netcdf * adios: depends on >> netcdf * etsf-io: depends on netcdf * elmerfem : RC BUGS. Not in >> testing (netcdf, gfortran introduce no new bugs) * plplot: RC Bugs. >> Not in testing. * cmor: * Ships .mod file, not used by any package >> currently. * Wait until netcdf transition starts, then rebuild. >> >> >> On the related libterralib, libdap transitions: libdap: * libdap >> uploaded. * grads: upload tomorrow. * gdal: Depend on metcdf >> >> libterralib: * libterralib: uploaded * magics++, metview will be >> uploaded after netcdf transition starts. >> >> AIUI, the netcdf transition should be ready. Bas, Nico, can you >> confirm? > > The netcdf packages in experimental are pretty much ready, but there > are some outstanding issues [1] and unanswered questions from the > previous discussion [2]. It seems with several RMs on vacation noone > is available to answer them from the Release Team side. I prefer to > wait until the Release Team is available before continuing with these > transitions.
gfortran and g++ are entangled, so from my point of view go ahead with it, however I can't formally approve it. Matthias
