On 06/14/2015 11:33 PM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: > I expect we'll need to resolve quite a number of issues in > the reverse dependencies to work with GDAL 2.0.0 before we can consider > it for unstable.
Once source for issues with the upcoming gdal (2.0.0-1) is the removal of the libgdal1-dev transitional package. Since gdal (1.9.0-1) libgdal-dev should be used instead. I've filed bugs with patches for the two packages that still unconditionally build depend on libgdal1-dev. Both bugreports use the gdal-2.0 usertag for convenient reference via: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=gdal-2.0;[email protected] Kind Regards, Bas -- GPG Key ID: 4096R/6750F10AE88D4AF1 Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146 50D1 6750 F10A E88D 4AF1 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: https://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
