-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 On 06/14/2015 11:39 AM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: > On 06/14/2015 10:55 AM, Ross Gammon wrote: >> As it is going to have to go through the NEW queue, and if it >> builds okay without -dcw & -gshhg, shouldn't we target >> experimental and upload? > > Yes, since libgmt had a SONAME bump the new gmt package should > first be uploaded to experimental.
Now that gmt-dcw & gmt-gshhg have been accepted, I've uploaded the first gmt 5 revision to experimental. Once that's passed the NEW queue I'll try to reproduce the many outstanding gmt bugs to see if they're still applicable to GMT 5. I expect we can close many of them. Kind Regards, Bas - -- GPG Key ID: 4096R/6750F10AE88D4AF1 Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146 50D1 6750 F10A E88D 4AF1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJVhYvmAAoJEGdQ8QrojUrxlIIQAITB2uITNepMlh5vkzW+s1rG Xl39nZ634Ihba4+iFu8LpUyXrEa/2XfZd8iIuNMU4s8ejZQezI1ldgcN1BuRdSIK EYN6uElfckfaikjdnjb8e1FVOicH8DD56alXwIQieX9c0kV/XJl90sUXwNnQBp6K zPU2ZLbHu50wahPsTurrFmOLu2oedFBtsEncXzYFJE0aO9B71nGyGXMkdOQYOTEb wrHSHGvyhho0p77BPvdlfq9gOV+LTj5JAQXhMo7NnAEfAqvonus8aeQZs0bv41a/ hPIFVclfld4ySJr+jNHqxnNa8n76hB6MO6PRddbYtwHStGf8OcZAULEHoJXX9UFo iO8rG136UNFN+nA0JycEp0fPSjjdriPOc/bdzyAxIdv+ED05w+CJkbnui5wVuPIr gg2xWoirAr6uLhx5ITq3HvcnTOFHhwNw6ZsFoVupjwpbdSzBlTZOZ8C+jftNEFj2 4WAyAsdji3e2uJ+Zcn3h9uNW4+nbUC0CTTSNtPrPGRDgLVzUsn9uYRvqnJIgnXG9 ISv84Du/ziYc5YZPBuhzORi0ihcfpB3KeGkdH/wPae66sVR4xR6xnldx/5GTD064 dry9IV+82Lb8s83fPNK/uEgkq3UtPuaX/nxXDdmJUiDKKGQalHzO14CY9XhH3N8O +ZlcJSzMhf4JpAhkPhir =Qthp -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: https://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
