Angelos, I just thought about this a bit more. We must remove the docs now because it contains some google analytics code which is not free software. If in a next release the docs are build without google analytics I think we can do without repackaging.
Johan On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 1:04 PM, Johan Van de Wauw <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 12:43 PM, Angelos Tzotsos <[email protected]> > wrote: >> Hi Johan, >> >> Thanks for your effort, it is really appreciated. >> >> The docs inside the package are there as a reference to the users. If this >> conflicts with Debian policy or something then I am ok removing them. > For the enduser the difference is small since they can have the > documentation as built in debian. > I'm in favor of keeping it inside the source package also, but I'm not > sure about the policy. I'll ask on debian mentors as well. >> >> Regarding cgi, this was added as a fast way to have pycsw working for >> OSGeoLive. I have WSGI package also in my todo list and actually I would >> prefer this solution since it is safer and faster. > > Ok, I'll switch to WSGI then. It is actually not more work than cgi. > Just setting WSGIScriptAlias in the conffile and adding the right > dependency (libapache2-mod-wsgi). > The only advantage of cgi over wsgi that I see is that people could > use other webservers than apache, but then again, they would have to > configure it themselves. > > Johan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: https://lists.debian.org/cajop35mp-gqurvkqc0lpgwkla1enhwv3o3g20ztpcrppwjh...@mail.gmail.com
