On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 1:54 PM, Andreas Tille <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Rashad, > > On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 01:46:05PM +0200, Rashad M wrote: > > > ... > > > /usr/bin/otbgui_* > > > /usr/bin/otbcli_* > > > > > > files rather to > > > > > > /usr/lib/otbgui > > > /usr/lib/otbcli > > > > > > and leave only the main executable (otbgui and otbcli) in /usr/bin and > > > setting the PATH accordingly. At least from an uninformed point where > I > > > am this somehow sensible. > > > > > > > I dont understand this. otbcli_* and otbgui_* are scripts and loads the > > application. So moving it to /usr/lib may not be good enough. > > > > BTW. what you mean leaving only main executable?. > > As I tried to express: I have no (I mean *really* no) idea about otb > just from packaging and in some cases (as I know now better not for otb) > a whole set of binaries is not intended to be called by the users. > Meanwhile I learned from a user that this is not the case here and so > my suggestion was stupid. Feel free to simply forget it. Sorry for > creating confusion by making stupid suggestions. > > Dont be sorry here. I jumped in because it always goes to /usr/bin/otbcli* and I thought to save trouble in making this change. Anyway if you have some problems as you said with lintian, feel free to discuss here or otb-developers group. I can help with what I know. I would be more interested in answers to the other parts of my mail and > the plan to move the package from UbuntuGIS to main Debian (to later > become a part of UbuntuGIS automatically via migration to Ubuntu. We > discussed this strategy on the UbuntuGIS mailing list before and I hope > we could continue with this plan. > > > Kind regards > > Andreas. > > -- > http://fam-tille.de > -- Regards, Rashad
