Good news everyone, we got the go ahead. \o/ If the QGIS 2.2 builds for experimental succeed, we can upload 2.2.0-1 to unstable as part of the SpatiaLite transition.
Kind Regards, Bas -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: Bug#731402: transition: spatialite Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2014 18:58:10 +0100 From: Julien Cristau <[email protected]> To: Sebastiaan Couwenberg <[email protected]>, [email protected], [email protected] Control: tag -1 confirmed On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 16:55:15 +0100, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: > Thanks for setting up the trackers. > > As just posted to the debian-gis list: > > https://lists.debian.org/debian-gis/2014/02/msg00004.html > > Am I correct that when we get the go ahead the transition process will > be as follows? > > 1) upload spatialite 4.1.1-6 to unstable > 2) upload librasterlite 1.1g-4 to unstable > 3) binnmu mapnik 2.2.0+ds1-6 in unstable > 4) upload libgaiagraphics 0.5-2 to unstable > 5) upload spatialite-tools 4.1.1-3 to unstable > 6) upload spatialite-gui 1.7.1-3 to unstable > 7) upload pyspatialite 3.0.1-5 to unstable > 8) binnmu gdal 1.10.1+dfsg-3 in unstable > 9) binnmu merkaartor 0.18.1-3 in unstable > 10) binnmu qgis 2.0.1-2 in unstable > Looks about right. > The new patches for the QGIS issues on ARM seem to work, the build > started last night completed successfully. When the fixed qgis > reaches unstable we're all set to rebuild the above packages. > Feel free to start the uploads to unstable. Let us know when binNMUs can be scheduled. Cheers, Julien -- GPG Key ID: 4096R/E88D4AF1 Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146 50D1 6750 F10A E88D 4AF1 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: https://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
