On 02.01.25 19:51, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
On 2025-01-02 19:37, Matthias Klose wrote:
On 02.01.25 19:04, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
On 2023-02-05 16:41, Adrian Bunk wrote:
On Sun, Feb 05, 2023 at 03:31:43PM +0100, Bastian Germann wrote:
On Tue, 08 Nov 2022 21:18:06 +0200 Adrian Bunk wrote:
gcc-11 should not be shipped in bookworm.
Maybe it is okay for the gcc-11 packages that cannot move to gcc-12 to go back
to gcc-10?
I guess, gcc-10 is not as easy to get out because of the gcc-plugin and gnat
stuff that is
not replaceable by gcc-11 or gcc-12.
...
None of these are in bookworm.
The complete list of packages in bookworm still using gcc-10 is:
- grub2
- shim
- simde (fixed in unstable)
It appears that nothing besides the gcc-11-cross* packages
(Build-)Depends on gcc-11 in trixie and unstable. I guess we should
reassign the bug to ftp.debian.org for package removal?
please keep it still in unstable, it's already removed in testing.
Do we really need to keep 6 GCC versions in the archive?
does it personally hurt you?
11 and 12 are the versions which were shipped in stable, and apparently
people still use these packages for backports.
