Control: reopen -1
Control: reassign -1 libgcc-s1

On Sun, 2024-07-28 at 15:30:09 +0000, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> Version: 9.5.0-6+rm
> 
> Dear submitter,
> 
> as the package gcc-9 has just been removed from the Debian archive
> unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports.  We are sorry
> that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.
> 
> For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/1076502

Bug still relevant, reopening and reassigning. Keeping the original
bug report below for context.

> Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2014 20:49:30 +0100
> From: Guillem Jover <guil...@debian.org>
> To: sub...@bugs.debian.org
> Subject: libgcc1: Can switch to use new Ignore-Blacklist-Groups for aeabi
>  symbols
> Message-ID: <20140115194930.ga25...@gaara.hadrons.org>
> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-12.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,FROMDEVELOPER,
>  HAS_PACKAGE,SPF_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham
>  version=3.3.2-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
> 
> Package: libgcc1
> Version: 1:4.8.2-13
> Severity: wishlist
> 
> With dpkg-dev 1.17.6, there's a new symbols file field named
> Ignore-Blacklist-Groups that can be used by the toolchain packages to
> ignore the entire blacklist group for the aeabi symbols, which are now
> blacklisted by regex instead of by an explicit list. This means that
> dpkg-dev will automatically blacklist new introduced symbols w/o
> having them leak into other package symbol files or having them FTBFS,
> and needing to add them manually to dpkg-dev and libgcc1.symbols.aeabi.
> 
> But to make gcc unconditionally include unknown aeabi symbols the
> ignore-blacklist tag is not enough, instead the new field can be used
> which disables the entire regex for that group. Adding something like:
> 
> ,---
> * Ignore-Blacklist-Groups: aeabi
> `---
> 
> at the top of libgcc1.symbols.aeabi should do the trick. You can then
> remove the ignore-blacklist tag if you want, or I guess you could keep
> it to avoid having to Build-Depend on a newer dpkg-dev.

Thanks,
Guillem

Reply via email to