On 25.07.23 14:30, Stéphane Glondu wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, 19 Dec 2022 15:25:43 +0100 Bastian Germann <b...@debian.org> wrote:
On Thu, 18 Aug 2022 23:43:14 +0200 Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
> As part of the effort to limit the number of llvm packages in the
> archive, it would be great if you could upgrade to -14.
> > We are trying NOT to ship Bookworm with llvm-toolchain-13.
> > llvm-defaults is now pointing to -14.
The package builds with llvm-dev. Please update.
Just replacing "llvm-13-dev" with "llvm-dev", the package indeed builds but
without LLVM support. One also needs to adapt debian/rules, and doing so makes
the package fail to build. With LLVM 14, 15 and 16.
llvm-toolchain-13 has become problematic: it fails to build in unstable, and
will soon start preventing packages from migrating to testing. It's time to get
rid of it.
I propose to upload a version of autofdo without LLVM support.
To make progress on this, I will make a NMU to DELAYED/5.
please see #1041473 and orphan the package with this upload.
