https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42540
--- Comment #12 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Zhihao Yuan from comment #11) > 1. Adjust the error message to say, "The first non-inline, non-pure function > may not have a definition in <Class>." That error comes from the linker. The linker is not part of GCC, so this is the wrong place to ask for linker changes. > 2. Add extra information to name the key function, and pass it to the > linker, generate an error message to match MSVC's quality. That's what comment 7 suggested. Comment 10 links to the response to that. -- You are receiving this mail because: You reported the bug.
