Your message dated Mon, 7 Sep 2015 18:57:27 +0200
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line gcc-5 5.2.1-16 now migrated to testing
has caused the Debian Bug report #794774,
regarding libstdc++6: Breaks: libboost-date-time1.55.0, but isn't that package 
fixed now?
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)


-- 
794774: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=794774
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: libstdc++6
Version: 5.2.1-14

A bunch of packages are being withheld from being upgraded via apt on
my Sid install. These seem to relate to the gcc5 transition. One
reported dependency breakage that is holding most/all back is from
libstdc++6 against libboost-date-time1.55.0.

Bug #777805 ("boost1.55: ftbfs with GCC-5") was filed against version
1.55.0+dfsg-3, and appears to have been resolved in 1.55.0+dfsg-4 back
in late June.

So, am I right in thinking libboost-date-time1.55.0 should be de-listed
from the breakage list in libstdc++6/gcc5 now?

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 5.2.1-16

Fixed.

--- End Message ---

Reply via email to