Hi Ludovic, On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 09:29:25AM +0100, Ludovic Brenta wrote: > Neil Williams <codeh...@debian.org> writes: > >> unless you tell me how the b-d > >> > >> gcc-4.9-source (<< 4.9.2) > >> > >> is satisfied in unstable, please leave this issue open. > > > > That doesn't make sense. gnat-4.9 in unstable has build-dependencies > > which can be satisfied in unstable. gnat-4.9 in testing has > > build-dependencies which can be satisfied in testing. > > > > Why would the build-dependency gcc-4.9-source (<< 4.9.2) in gnat-4.9 in > > *testing* be relevant when checked in unstable? > > Correct but I think Matthias' mail alludes to his freeze exception > request (#774221) which, if and when granted, will break the > build-dependency of gnat-4.9 in testing and require that gnat-4.9 also > migrate from unstable to testing; I commented to that effect in the > request. > > So, this bug is technically closed but might resurface in the near > future.
Since the last britney run, gcc-4.9 4.9.2-10 is in testing, so now gnat-4.9 needs an update as well. Cheers, Ivo -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150305221933.ga31...@ugent.be
