Control: tags -1 + help this is not seen on the gcc-4.9 Linaro branch, so a ARM porter should identify the relevant backport.
On 12/25/2014 06:12 AM, Matthias Klose wrote: > the escalation is wrong. there exist several workarounds for it (lowering the > optimization, using gcc-4.8, ...). I asked the ARM porters to address this > properly (Hector on IRC agreed to forward this), however I don't see any > progress here. Now CCing debian-arm explicitly. > > On 12/23/2014 11:48 AM, Santiago Vila wrote: >> severity 764732 serious >> thanks >> >> On Fri, 10 Oct 2014, Hector Oron wrote: >> >>> Package: gcc-4.9 >>> Version: 4.9.1-16 >>> Severity: important >>> >>> Hello, >>> >>> Found a FTBFS while trying to build unzip package in Debian/sid on armhf >>> host. >>> >>> [...] >> >> Yesterday, I uploaded unzip 6.0-13 fixing several security bugs, but >> it will not migrate to testing because of this, which has just been >> reported against unzip as Bug #773785. >> >> Since this is really a gcc bug, I'm raising the severity accordingly. >> >> Please tell me about the likelihood that this is indeed fixed in gcc, >> because if it's low I will have to look for a workaround in unzip >> (such as lowering the optimization level). >> >> Thanks. >> >> > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/549c0b9d.3040...@debian.org