On 14/12/12 15:31, Matthias Klose wrote: > Am 14.12.2012 15:19, schrieb Roland Stigge: >>> but this one doesn't look for the v1/v0 distinction and uses the same >>> multiarch >>> tuple for both. Please bring it in a form which can go upstream. >> >> In your other mail you wrote about tm_file being replaced by >> tm_file_list. Should I assume that tm_file (which includes e500-double.h >> by which the distinction of v1 is made) is included into tm_file_list >> somehow (what I currently can't see), or should we patch >> src/gcc/config.gcc to include e500-double.h into tm_file_list instead of >> tm_file? > > I don't know the powerpcspe target that well. Adding a header looks wrong.
That's what current upstream does in src/gcc/config.gcc: e500-double.h is added to the tm_file (list) to make the distinction between v1 and default/v2. If you don't have another suggestion, I would adjust upstream to do actually the same, but do via tm_file_list instead of tm_file (as you suggested). Would this be OK for you (i.e. Debian and forwarding upstream)? Thanks in advance, Roland -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/50cb39b7.6070...@antcom.de
