On 2 March 2011 03:34, Matthias Klose <d...@debian.org> wrote: > I'll make gcc-4.5 the default for (at least some) architectures within the > next > two weeks before more transitions start. GCC-4.5 is already used as the > default > compiler for almost any other distribution, so there shouldn't be many > surprises > on at least the common architectures. About 50% of the build failures > exposed > by GCC-4.5 are fixed [1]. I didn't see issues on amd64 and i386, armel > (although optimized for a different processor) and powerpc (some object > files > linked into shared libs had to be built as pic). > > As the maintainer file for the ports in GCC is a bit outdated, I'd like to > ask > which architectures should do the switch together with the four > architectures > mentioned above, and which not, and which ones should be better delayed, or > dropped. > > Could you add armhf to the list?
Konstantinos
