On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 05:49:49PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: > On 26.02.2011 04:42, Steve M. Robbins wrote: > >On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 03:57:28PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: > >>On 25.02.2011 08:46, Steve M. Robbins wrote: > > > >>>Clearly one should be mindful of the effect on GCC -- that's why I > >>>asked the question on debian-gcc. Do you have any specific concerns? > > > >Have any concerns been raised on the GCC mailing list? I've googled > >and found only anecdotal positive reports: > > > > http://www.listware.net/201003/gcc-gcc/99756-gmp-501-and-gcc-45.html > > > > > > > >>>Is there a GCC autobuilder suite that can do all these rebuilds? I > >>>will upload there. > >> > >>I don't have such a setup. > > > >OK, but someone must have a similar setup. People are occasionally > >rebuilding the archive to test new GCC versions. Anyone on the > >debian-gcc list got an idea? > > does gcc still work when gmp5 is in the archive, and mpfr is not yet > rebuilt against the new gmp5?
Sure: I've been running that way at home for a year. Why wouldn't it work? Instead of asking cryptic questions, could you please spell out your concerns in detail so that we could address them. Thanks, -Steve
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
