On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 02:02:35PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > On 23.08.2010 13:21, Pierre Habouzit wrote: > >On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 04:05:32AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > >>On 21.08.2010 14:56, Julien Cristau wrote: > >>>On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 19:33:12 +0200, Arthur Loiret wrote: > >>> > >>>>Now, to be clear, what nice things would gcc-4.5 bring to our users? > >>>>There is a complete list here [0], but those ones are, in my opinion, > >>>>very nice: > >>>> - The new link time optimiser. > >>>> - Improved C++0x support. > >>>> - Plugins support. > >>>> > >>>My understanding is that lto in 4.5 is not quite there yet. Not that > >>>I've tried it or anything. > >> > >>I don't share your understanding. I tried it for some builds. > > > >I've tried it on the work repository, and lto ICEs the compiler. Plus I > >get 2 other independant ICEs that I've not had time to reduce (hence the > >lack of bug report yet). > > > >Though this happens with the gcc-4.5 in unstable, I've not tried with > >the one from experimental yet. > > confused. up to now there is no gcc-4.5 in unstable.
Yeah, forget it, it was an older experimental version, some 4.5.0, and it's fixed with the last ones. -- ·O· Pierre Habouzit ··O madco...@debian.org OOO http://www.madism.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100823121354.gk1...@madism.org
