------- Comment #7 from mikpe at it dot uu dot se  2009-10-15 14:12 -------
(In reply to comment #6)
> A bisection has identified revision 139725 as the origin of this regression.

That revision added support for -fsection-anchors on arm and enabled it by
default at -O1 and above. Compiling with -fno-section-anchors eliminates the
regressions in the binutils ld testsuite (tested with 4.4.1 and 4.5-20091008).

I did a test with the range of anchor offsets reduced from [-4088,+4095] to a
tiny [-120,+127], which should work with any arm instruction, but that did not
eliminate the regressions.

I'm currently bootstrapping and testing a patch which disable section anchors
on arm. It will be interesting to see if it fixes any testsuite failures.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41684

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Reply via email to