------- Comment #17 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2009-04-22 19:32 ------- Subject: Re: [4.4/4.5 regression] symbol __signb...@glibcxx_3.4 in libstdc++ not exported anymore
> * Original submitter is incorrect, there has never been a > __signb...@glibcxx_3.4 symbol, and there should not be one now? The symbol is present in libstdc++.so.6.0.9 and libstdc++.so.6.0.10, but not in libstdc++.so.6.0.8 or libstdc++.so.6.0.11. > * I have changed the glibc hppa-linux-gnu port to define > __NO_LONG_DOUBLE_MATH, > and therefore the signbit macro, even in the abscense of optimization, will > always return a valid signbit function based on the type size. I'm not convinced this is a good idea at this point. As far as I know, it is ok to have the same size for double and long double. However, they are distinct types. Dave -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39491 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
