------- Comment #8 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2009-01-29 17:53 ------- Subject: Re: [4.3 regression] wrong code building libgsf
Sent from my iPhone On Jan 29, 2009, at 2:01 AM, "rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org > wrote: > > > ------- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-29 > 10:01 ------- > The best option would be to revert that patch on the branch. Except it alone could not cause wrong code. Some other pass is causing it. And then again with a testcase it is hard to figure out what is going wrong. That patch just disables one small optimization in one case. > > > > -- > > rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: > > What |Removed |Added > --- > --- > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > CC| |sje at gcc dot gnu > dot org, > | |rguenth at gcc dot > gnu dot > | |org > Priority|P3 |P1 > Target Milestone|--- |4.3.4 > > > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39015 > -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39015 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
