------- Comment #9 from zadeck at naturalbridge dot com 2007-11-06 21:52 ------- Subject: Re: [4.1/4.2/4.3 Regression] GCC generates wrong code for infinitely recursive functions
ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: > ------- Comment #8 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-06 21:33 > ------- > >> I just talked to mark mitchell who was wearing his official language >> lawyer hat at the time. He said i had to fix it. i will submit a patch >> in the next day or so. >> > > Thanks in advance. > > > I am only snarly about this because i do not want to give up marking recurrences as pure or const. That will, in the long run, cost us. Mark and i talked about adding another bit to the tree so that we could support non recursive and recursive pure and const functions. the recursive ones could still be cse'd but not dce'd. This is not appropriate for stage 3. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33826 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
