------- Comment #9 from tbm at cyrius dot com 2007-10-20 06:10 ------- (In reply to comment #8) > Would you do the following for the failing assert? > p debug_rtx (insn) > p debug_rtx (i1) > p debug_rtx (substed)
Breakpoint 3, delete_output_reload (insn=0x2ab2d757c140, j=1, last_reload_reg=21) at /home/tbm/scratch/gcc-4.2/gcc/reload1.c:7932 7932 gcc_assert (!rtx_equal_p (XEXP (i1, 0), substed)); (gdb) p debug_rtx (insn) (insn 73 78 76 5 (set (mem/c:SI (plus:SI (reg/f:SI 3 %r3) (const_int 17888 [0x45e0])) [19 S4 A32]) (plus:SI (reg/f:SI 3 %r3) (const_int 1056 [0x420]))) 114 {addsi3} (nil) (expr_list:REG_EQUIV (plus:SI (reg/f:SI 3 %r3) (const_int 1056 [0x420])) (nil))) $1 = void (gdb) p debug_rtx (i1) (expr_list:REG_EQUIV (mem/c:SI (plus:SI (reg/f:SI 3 %r3) (const_int 17888 [0x45e0])) [19 S4 A32]) (nil)) $2 = void (gdb) p debug_rtx (substed) (mem/c:SI (plus:SI (reg/f:SI 3 %r3) (const_int 17888 [0x45e0])) [19 S4 A32]) $3 = void (gdb) -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32889 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]