* Adam Borowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-06-28 23:49]: > README.Debian says: > | You might also like to use a shell script to wrap up this > | funcationality, e.g. > | place in /usr/local/bin/gcc-snapshot and chmod +x it > but I see no reason why it couldn't simply be shipped in the package > outright. It's not like it invades anyone's namespace, etc. It would be > also consistent with all other gcc packages, all having the executable named > the same as the package. At least after having tested my stuff with gcc-4.2 > in the past, I didn't even suspect gcc-snapshot could be any different until > ./configure failed :p I know, it's like driving by memory, but in most > cases like this meeting people's assumptions is nice. > There's little reason to force people to some cut&paste work just to use > this package...
doko, what do you think about this? -- Martin Michlmayr http://www.cyrius.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
