peter green writes: > >Next GCC 4.2 will be prepared to be included in unstable; a current > >issue is http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4302 which has > >to be resolved before g++-4.2 can enter unstable. > That bug is marked as "resolved invalid" with a reply "Those symbols are > for glibc. Why do they have libstdc++ version names? I think it is a gcc > bug. Please open a gcc bug instead." > > Does anyone know if such a bug has been filed and if so where?
the upstream gcc-4_1-branch doesn't include the ldbl changes. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
