------- Comment #7 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-20 23:21 ------- (In reply to comment #6) > I think the point Ian was trying to make with (3) was simply that it doesn't > matter whether you choose to implement the reports of unknown -Wno-* (ie (2)) > using the existing warning mechanism or by just printing to stderr. So it > isn't > a separate thing that needs to be done. >
OK. I misread it, thanks for the clarification. So, nothing to be done for (3) since there is already a mechanism to report unknown options. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28322 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
