------- Comment #24 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2007-01-30 02:21 ------- (In reply to comment #23) > From consistency point of view I would say that the change should also > be done for std::exception.
Right. > However, the use of typeid is very convenient in the sense that we > have to defined what() only once. Now, if we change that definition > in std::exception, it means that we should revisit all other exception > classes, such as std::runtime_error, etc. I see, but I don't think we have to do much, because the other exception classes, provided in <stdexcept>, per the standard requirements are already overriding what() to return _M_msg.c_str(). Thus, I'm coming to the conclusion that we should consistently change std::exception too and be done with it. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14493 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
