On Mon, Dec 18, 2006 at 03:19:16PM +0300, Nikita V. Youshchenko wrote: > > On Sat, Dec 16, 2006 at 03:37:48PM +0300, Nikita V. Youshchenko wrote: > > > > - If you have a package that needs updating, *please* don't forget > > > > to contact us. *Don't expect us to find out about it on our own*.
> > > Please allow gcc-doc-defaults 4.1.1.nf3 into etch. > > > This upload fixes RC bug (#403328); the only change from previous > > > version is addition of missing Conflicts: entry. > > I don't understand why this is listed as a Conflicts:, instead of as a > > Conflicts: + Replaces:. Matthias, could you please comment? > Frankly saying, I still don't understand the details of 'Conflicts+Replaces > vs Conflicts' issue. Reading policy 7.5 and around doesn't help much. > Is 'Conflicts+Replaces' more correct in this case? Why? The 'Replaces' affects how the packaging tools decide which package should take precedence in the case of a conflict. > I'm ready to upload version with 'Conflicts+Replaces' at any moment if > needed. I think that would still be best. Cheers, -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
