------- Comment #4 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-22 23:34 -------
Bryce pointed out that we need to deal with the primitive class
objects somehow. Otherwise code like 'new int[5]' will pull in
libgcj.so.
I'll send a patch to the java-patches list.
Could you try it on your test cases?
I tried in on my copy of ecj.jar and verified that it works.
--
tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |tromey at gcc dot gnu dot
|dot org |org
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2006-08-22 23:34:30
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28698
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
