Ludovic Brenta writes: > Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > The second thing is to remove the gfdl'd texi files from the sources, > > so that the package still builds. The idea is to replace these files > > with dummy content, such that the build still succeds and the Makefile > > don't have to be patched. > > Unless I am mistaken, there was a Debian General Resolution lately > that allows GFDL'd documents in main, provided they have no > front-cover text, no back-cover text and no invariants. I am > concerned that wholesale deletion of all documentation from the GCC > package is a disservice to users. Should we not rather assess each > document individually and remove only those that fail the General > Resolution criteria?
sure, are there any? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
